Icecat vs pale moon vs seamonkey install#
Icecat vs pale moon vs seamonkey code#
Icecat vs pale moon vs seamonkey windows 7#

I believe a browser is not, or is more than a skin, than an interface for browsing, it has its specifics which correspond to the developer’s philosophy of what he considers a browser should be, what it shouldn’t be, and what it aims to achieve in its road map. Of course if there is one specific add-on a user really considers essential, available for Firefox but not for Pale Moon and with no alternative, then that scenario can be dissuasive. Do we complain about Firefox add-ons not running on Chrome or Vivaldi? Same with Pale Moon which has its own library of add-ons which should fulfill the needs of most users.

Icecat vs pale moon vs seamonkey windows 7#

XP was a very good OS, as Windows 7 still is, but XP is really too old now, as Windows 7 one day will be.Ĭoncerning Pale Moon, it is indeed a browser of its own now. You can feel bad about it, but not complain. You can complain about companies going faster than users, but cannot when you are yourself going slower than everyone.

A pain in the arse? You bet, but still more preferable to using FFx all the time. Once finished with that site I return to PM. It sits as a desktop icon and when PM balks at a web page, I reluctantly jump to FFx with the copied URL and paste it in.

Icecat vs pale moon vs seamonkey install#

I never thought I would see the day when I would install Firefox again, but a few months back I did just that with FFx49. I suspect the announcement is more to reassure the current users that help is on the way – and – to stop people jumping ship.

The rendering engine was tweaked to improve stuff, but it broke other stuff along the way. Having said that, I have been a long time fan of Palemoon but 26xxx became PaleMoan for me. However it was mostly a version-issue and can be stepped around with… But with something like Otter-Browser together you will have a cool setup!Ībout the security aspect, security patches are applied and backported on/towards Pale Moon, so even if the engine and the supported standards are not up to date, you are still more or less secured against web didn’t stop them working **mostly** it was the developers of the add-ons that drew the line in the sand and **prevented** (as in – too lazy to maintain some backwards compatibility) them from working. The same problem with Pale Moon 26 and before since they decided to fork older Mozilla backend engine versions.Īnyway, without a backup browser i would not recommend using Pale Moon. This will also not change much in the near future. Especially when pages use latest ES6 script features or newer, which Pale Moon 27 either only partly or not at all supports. Because site incompatibilities already exist right now with it. Use it not without a good backup browser. Anyway, using not the latest Gecko engine makes Pale Moon 27 already rather outdated as since the release of that version tons of improvements have been made by Mozilla to ensure support of latest web standards. So it is a hybrid browser, not really based on one single version.

Icecat vs pale moon vs seamonkey code#

Now You: What's your take on the upcoming Pale Moon 27.0?Įngine based on something like Gecko 38+ with the UI code of Firefox 24. It won't support encrypted media extensions (EME) on the other hand which means that sites that rely on it cannot stream content to Pale Moon using HTML5 video or audio. The new version of Pale Moon will support media source extensions (MSE) which improves compatibility with sites using HTML5 video and audio sites.Pale Moon 27 will ship with improved font features such as support for WOFF2 and better handling of complex font delivery systems.The rendering engine Goanna is upgraded to version 3.0 introducing support for DirectX 11, Direct2D 1.1 and layout and rendering improvements that go along with that.Pale Moon 27 will offer better JavaScript support in regards to ECMAScript 6 standard compatibility.Pale Moon 27.0 positive changesĪs far as positive changes are concerned, there are quite a few: Pale Moon 26.x supported these extensions. Probably the biggest change of them all is that Pale Moon won't support Jetpack or add-on SDK extensions any longer. The team notes that previous translations and language packs won't work, but that localization will be made available at a later point in time.Īlso, some complete themes of Firefox that worked in the past may not be compatible with the new version of Pale Moon 27. Another change that is affecting some users is that Pale Moon 27 will only be available in English initially.